Ottoman
Sephardic Genealogy: An Introduction
Page
3.
by Dr. David Sheby
Continued...
1.3.3
Example 2: Pronunciation of a family name
One
branch of an Ottoman Sephardic family emigrated to the U.S. and spelled
the family beginning with "SH. A second branch emigrated to South America,
and began their name with "CH", pronouncing "CH" as in Spanish (not
the "CH" of French). A question rose over which branch correctly preserved
the family's traditional pronunciation. Documentation from modern Turkey
(i.e., post 1928 tombstones and correspondence) showed the family name
spelled using the "s-cedilla" letter (see Figure
1.14) thus supporting the "SH" pronunciation
1.4
Introduction to Ottoman Geography: the "Vilayet" (Province) on the Birth
Certificate
In
this section the place names of the Ottoman Empire are introduced. Additional
detail is covered in Section 4.0 (Ottoman Place Names).
The
Ottoman Empire kept meticulous records. The Ottomans were great tax
collectors, and for tax collection to be efficient, an accurate assessment
of expected revenue had to be regularly determined (i.e., the identities,
assets, and tax liabilities of potential taxpayers). As a result, the
Ottomans took regular census surveys of their territories. There were
also geopolitical motivations for census-taking. The Ottoman Empire
needed to know the ethnic composition of its various territories (particularly
in the Balkans where there was a significant non-Moslem population),
especially where there were vulnerabilities to external groups seeking
to assume the role of protector for segments of the Empire's citizenry.
Census records could identify vulnerabilities, and dispute claims concerning
majority/minority ethnic compositions. As a result the study of Ottoman
census/demographic records is of prime importance to academics studying
Ottoman history. The classic work detailing Ottoman censuses and their
results is:
Karpat,
Kemal H.: Ottoman Population 1830-1914, University of Wisconsin
Press, 1985 ISBN 0-299-09160-0
For
such administrative purposes, the Ottoman Empire was composed of administrative
units, the largest unit being a "province" known as the vilayet
(alternative name: "eyalet"). The vilayet is recorded on the
Ottoman birth certificate (see Figure 1.1: box translated as "state",
isolated as Fig. 1.9 [1]). The Ottoman birth certificate's spelling
for vilayet (Fig 1.9 [1a] enlarged as Fig.
1.9 [2c]) is defined as "province" (ruled by a Governor) in the standard
Ottoman-to-English dictionary (Fig. 1.9 [2]):
A
Turkish and English Lexicon: Shewing in English the Significations of
the Turkish Terms (published in 1890 by Sir James W. Redhouse) (known
as the "Redhouse Dictionary"). The Redhouse dictionary is available
as a reprint through Librairie du Liban (Beirut: URL: http://librairie_du_liban.com.lb
ISBN 975-454-000-4; Library
of Congress Classification PL191.R52).
Figure
1.15
The Redhouse dictionary's spelling of vilayet
(page 2,148; enlarged (Fig 1.15 [d]) matches the birth certificate's
spelling (Fig. 1.15 [a]) letter-by-letter (read right to left). The
vilayet handwritten entry (Fig. 1.15 [b]) is for Hudavendigar (graciously
identified as such by the owner!): this is confirmed by a letter-by-letter
comparison of the handwritten entry with the spelling of Hudavendigar
(Fig. 1.15 [e]) contained in volume 1 (page 226) of the 5-volume set:
Bayindir, Mustafa Hilma: Osmanli-Turka Posta Muhur ve Damgalari (Ottoman-Turkish
Seals and Postmarks) 1840-1929. Istanbul, 1992. See: http://www.kilim.com.tr/filateli
(Note: See map (Figure 7 at: http://www.sephardicstudies.org/gallipoli2.html)
for location of the Vilayet of Hudavendigar.)
The
number of vilayets (Table 1.5) varied with time and depended on both
(1) geo-politics, and (2) administrative reorganization incentives.
As the Ottoman Empire lost certain territories (e.g., Bosnia and Bulgaria
in their entirety, and western Thrace to Greece and many Aegean islands
to Italy) there would be the defacto loss of the vilayets within those
territories. Reorganization programs would result in newly organized
vilayets or resized vilayets. The names of the vilayets could also change.
Table
1.5 : Numbers of Vilayets in the Ottoman Empire in the 19th century |
Year
|
Number
of vilayets in the Ottoman Empire for that year
|
Source
|
1831
|
29
|
p.
8 Karpat (1985)
|
1834
|
28
|
"early"
1850's
|
36
("eyalets") with 440 sanjaks
|
1870
|
23
|
1875
|
25
|
1890
|
36
(does not include special districts) with 146 sanjaks
|
Peker
(p. 28, see below)
|
1893
|
27
|
Karpat
(1985)
|
Vilayets
were divided in sanjaks (or sancak) (sub-provinces) which, in turn,
were divided into kazas (cities, Fig. 1.16). Affiliated with each
kaza were numerous small villages. In 1850 there were 36 eyalets
comprised of 440 sanjaks, in 1890 there were 36 vilayets
comprised of 146 sanjaks. The chief town of a sanjak
was called the "merkez kazasi" (central kasa") The vilayet
Hudavendigar contains the city of Brussa (Bursa) on
Turkey's main Anatolian component. Table 1.6 lists sources of maps
for Ottoman vilayets.
Figure. 1.16
Visual demonstration of a vilayet made up with sanjaks and kazas.
Table
1.6 Sources of Ottoman Vilayet Maps |
Year |
Source |
Map
of Ottoman Vilayets 1893 |
Karput
(2 pages) |
Map
of Ottoman Vilayets 1890 |
Peker
(back insert) |
Map
of Individual Vilayets |
Bayindir
(maps spread over 5 volumes) |
The
Ottoman Empire's Administrative structure (vilayets, sanjaks, kazas)
in 1890 can be found in: Peker, Ugur A.: Osmanli Imparatorlugu
Idari Taksimat ve Posta S,ubeleri Hircri 1306, Miladi 1890 (The
Administrative Division and the Post Offices in the Ottoman Empire),
Berkmen Philatelics, 1984.
Return
to Page 1